Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gabbie's avatar

i just want to say that I do appreciate your newly added (I think -- sorry if I missed it before) AI disclaimer and I hope you keep it there in all articles going forward. but I will continue to maintain that even if you're using AI to synthesize your research (which hopefully you're fact checking, since AI hallucinates so much? but you say you have decades of experience in music so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here), I know I would be far, FAR more interested in reading these articles in your own words.

there is a reason I knew your articles were AI without needing any outside confirmation, and that's because they read like LinkedIn posts. your actual emotional reaction to the music you know so well is what I want to read. if you supplement that, if you rewrite some AI-organized research into your own words, so be it. but ultimately, I don't think I'm alone when I say that in fact this method does NOT feel authentic or exciting. otherwise I would never have noticed!

I'm not saying this to be a dick. I'm saying this to tell you that your background, your knowledge, your passion -- all of those things have value and you don't need the crutch. We want to see your actual thoughts, messy as they may be.

Expand full comment
The Twelve Inch (Disco/80s)'s avatar

I’ve just made a mental note to pull out my Portishead albums for another spin. My favorite remains the Roseland NYC Live album, timeless beauty.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts